Monday, April 20, 2015

Only What I Know: My Learning Process and What I Learned From It

My Achievements

I was successful in a number of ways. I got a guitar. I learned to string it. I learned to tune it. I got a metronome. I got a tuner. I got a pick. I got a book. I bought lessons. I found online resources. I used those resources and participated in guitar talk with people I don’t know. I practiced each week. Still, I fell short in a number of ways. Most notably I did not learn in time a beginner’s song as I’d originally hoped. I can strum and I can remember finger placement for three chords and four notes well enough, I suppose, but I think I’m a couple of weeks off from properly playing my song. Even so, I was pleasantly surprised to find I could use online resources to get better at the sort of task that has in the past required me to learn almost exclusively from a teacher in a face-to-face setting.

My Experience as a Learner

This learning experience was for me a successful one in many ways, perhaps mostly because I’ve had to articulate my process by way of this blog. By writing out my thoughts and my steps on this blog, I’ve had to think and express myself clearly on how I learn, what has worked, what hasn’t, and what I’d do differently next time in order to learn more effectively and efficiently. Writing things out has been good for me, that is. I was motivated to practice each week because I set a goal and because I am writing publicly in this blog about how I am making (and not making) progress toward my goal. Perhaps the thing that frustrated or discouraged me most was the realization that I would not be able to timely achieve my goal as originally hoped and that I should have set a less ambitious goal. Maybe I should have just tried to learn how to do the Dougie. The whole point of the song is to teach a dance. How hard could it be?

My Process as a Learner

I had three main resources to support my learning process: a book, a teacher, and the internet. In the past, I would have leaned most heavily on the teacher followed by the book with the internet in last place. However, this time the order was reversed. That’s because I was most helped by the questions I asked at the guitar fora and the answers I received from helpful yet anonymous people on those websites. The conversations I had on these websites and the collaboration I experienced as a result of these conversations was really my first experience with web-based participatory learning outside of my courses in this program. These conversations required a form of communication -- a digital literacy -- that I was not familiar with at first but now feel comfortable in using.

Specifically, web forum speak -- a language I think I’ve now picked up -- provided me access to an awful lot of information on a wide variety of guitar topics that I would not otherwise have had access to.  The great thing about web fora interaction is that it is anonymous and it is understood that the basis for association is nothing other than the common interest in the subject under discussion. This means it is fine to walk away from people who offer unhelpful interaction. That’s not always possible in a face-to-face interaction where identities are fully disclosed and there is a person who can react in an unpredictable way.

Implications for Instructional Practice

This experience has taught me the importance of project based learning and of the importance in allowing students to choose the subject and goals of a project based learning assignment. My inability to achieve the goal I set for myself implies that I will need to engage with students early and often during the course of project formulation and milestone achievement in order to help students determine whether they are making adequate progress toward the goal they’ve set and, if not, then allow modification of the project and its goal or perhaps even a complete revision and restart. What I’ve seen is that goals initially set are not necessarily informed by experience so much as hope, and that that is an insufficient basis in some cases for determining milestones and expectations.

Implications for Teaching 21st Century Literacies

My engagement in participatory learning required what I’ve referred to above as forum speak, a literacy skill. There is an anonymous exchange of information that takes place in web fora. This exchange follows a set of rules. These rules are partly expressed in FAQs on the website but they are mostly embedded (without announcing themselves as rules) in the way that people on the fora address one another. This manner of exchange is not like the way that teacher and student relate to one another in a face-to-face context. The relationship online is between equals. There is no designated teacher and learner. Anyone in the fora can play either role in any conversation. Everyone is anonymous. There is little harm in saying the “wrong” thing as no bad reputation can attach to an online identity that is made up simply for the purpose of participating in the forum. This fact allows people to exchange ideas and information more freely than they would otherwise. There are some dangers associated with this fact too.


Literacy instruction in the classroom must be designed to account for both the quick accessibility of anonymously offered and potentially expert information and the danger of potentially abusive interaction created by the same anonymity. Research or skill building projects that make use of online fora must include guidance about what students are likely to learn from such resources in addition to the sort of risks involved in seeking it out, to say nothing of parental involvement, which may be key in minimizing risk of student exposure to abusive language.

Monday, April 13, 2015

Only What I Know: My Digital Identity, Blogging and Online Collaboration

Blogging and My Digital Identity

Before I began blogging for this class, I did not have a digital identity, none that I knew of, at least. Now I am at least aware that all the things I do or say on the internet -- including this blog post -- will probably be around forever somewhere, and that that’s my identity, good, bad or indifferent. Google now tells me I am part of the blogosphere. (I did not think to look before this class.) While looking for my impact on the internet, I even found some blog posts I wrote years ago and completely forgot about!

The overly paranoid Rob Lowe in me understands that my online activity is probably tracked and stored by someone somewhere, whether by business, government, or the illuminati. And I know that this information could even be used against me later on, particularly if it is even seemingly negative or questionable. Thinking on my digital identity has made me more careful about how I present myself on the internet. (I’m looking right at you, Facebook.) I know I must also advise my students to be careful too.

Collaborative Learning and My Digital Identity


My blogging hasn’t made a star in the blogosphere yet. I’m still hard to find. (That’s a good thing, I think.) But it is fun to see where I posted anonymously on guitar websites. Although no one knows what I wrote, it is personally gratifying to know I started conversations that may help other guitar learners a week or even years later. The folks at the guitar sites don’t know who I am but that does not prevent them from acting in a (mostly) neighborly way, sharing with me tips and tricks on learning guitar.

Monday, April 6, 2015

Only What I Know: Collaboration is part of the learning process

Influence

I am learning one note at a time with my book. I am also reading what other guitar learners are learning and talking about at my online guitar groups, Guitar Noise and Guitar for Beginners. Each site has a forum that hosts conversations on subjects that are relevant to where I am in the process of learning guitar. I’ve posted at each a couple of times. Although I do not have anyone I could call a mentor yet, and I haven’t started in person training either, the responses at the websites have helped me understand how to tune my guitar and how to know when my strings need to be replaced.

Challenges

The main challenges posed by online collaboration (e.g., via forum conversation) is that the advice I receive is based only on the information I provide, is not instantaneous, and is offered by anonymous people who may or may not be expert for all I really know. The advice from online collaboration sometimes conflicts with other advice earlier received. It can also be indeterminate, inaccurate, too general, etc. This is because the advice is not based on the advisor’s direct experience with my situation.

Conflicts

In my experience so far, conflicting advice does arise during online collaboration. Its presence has caused me to wonder which of two or more competing sources is to be trusted. Sometimes I even question whether any competing source knows what is best for me to do in my situation. When there is a conflict on what I should do, I try to resolve it by weighing the evidence and argument supporting the competing opinions. When that does not do the trick, I just do my own research! The upside of conflict is that it requires me to think hard about who is right and how I know and whether I need to get additional information from other sources.

Divergence
Online collaboration seems to produce divergence, not a restraint on creativity. I say that because if you ask online for an opinion on this product or that, or this method or that, you’re bound to get a lot of differing views, and some of these will be unexpected and quite creative. Even when those opinions don’t solve my problem, at least they get me thinking about what else I might do to fix things.

Net Effect


Although it can be particularly tricky and time consuming to sort via the internet the good advisors and good advice from the bad, online collaboration has so far been a net positive for me. That’s because I’m a curious person who likes going from one topic to a related but distinct topic. When I ask a question, I get lots of answers to choose from. Some are good. Some are not so good. But the collaboration itself provides me many opportunities to follow up on the advice received by asking better, sharper questions and by doing my own research, which I enjoy.